|famke (right) with hugh jackman & halle berry @ tokyo press conference, july 13th 2006 [pic: andrez]
"I've played a lot of psychos, for some reason. Don't think I'm some
kind of psycho myself - or you can if you want to. I really don't care!"
So jested Famke Janssen in a recent interview with de-VICE, while
in Tokyo with costars Hugh Jackman and Halle Berry to promote the third X-Men movie.
In The Last Stand, Janssen switches tack from the loyal and heroic
Jean Grey of the earlier chapters, and smolders instead as the increasingly insane, all-powerful Phoenix.
The actress has relevant experience - you may recall her turn, a decade
ago, as the uber-sexy assassin with lethal legs, Xenia Onatopp, in the James Bond movie GoldenEye.
"Playing psychos is fun," Janssen confessed. "They give you
the license and freedom that you don't have when you play a normal person. Because, with a psycho, there's no limit, you can
absolutely ham it up."
In Chris Claremont and John Byrne's original Marvel Comics incarnation
of this X-Men tale in the early '80s, the "Phoenix" storyline centered upon the corruptive influence of absolute power, and
the redemptive qualities of love and loyalty.
It's been a recurring theme in myriad Marvel offshoots.
The celluloid interpretation, 25 years on, follows a similar dictum,
but much darker, and this time - as a direct result of Jean's psychotic turn - a bunch of integral characters die.
Don't sit around waiting for these recently deceased characters to
rise phoenix-like themselves in any future franchise spin-offs. Janssen herself suggested that the resurrection jig is up.
"At this point that may become laughable," she asserted. "I know that
the comic book fans were really hoping that we'd go with the Phoenix saga after the second movie, but for a lot of people
who don't know the comic angle there's some confusion - I mean, my character died! How did she come back? And so on. I think
you could lose a sizeable chunk of the audience if you keep bringing characters back from the dead two or three times"
The man most responsible for successfully adapting X-Men's comic franchise
into the movie biz was director Bryan Singer (The Usual Suspects), who helmed the first two movies.
"Bryan is an amazing director," Janssen said during the interview.
"He set up those films with a great group of actors, and he definitely established the tone - it was a very realistic setting.
It wasn't all glitz and glamour, the way comic books had been portrayed up until that point. Comic books are dark, and I think
Bryan tapped into that. Teenagers like these comics because they sit at home wondering why they don't belong, and then they
read these stories and realize these characters are just like them - they don't belong, either."
Ironically Janssen, who grew up in the Netherlands, wasn't one of
these typical angst-ridden, comic-obsessed teenagers at all. Well, perhaps not in quite the same way.
"We were more likely to be reading Tintin," she admitted.
"Personally I found comics a little confusing; I was more into novels. With a novel you simply read from left to right, but
comics have all those little balloons, and I never knew where to look."
For the third and possibly final chapter in the X-Men series, Singer
vacated the director's chair to helm Superman Returns instead.
In his absence, first Matthew Vaughn (Layer Cake), then Brett
Ratner (Rush Hour) worked on this most recent "X"-travaganza.
"Yes, we had a different director and, yes, we had a different kind
of sensibility - which I think you can tell when you watch the movie," Janssen said. "But for me, personally, it became a
much more challenging experience because the character became much more emotional and much deeper. Bryan has specific ideas
and can be a tad more controlling as a director. Brett, on the other hand, is a lot more all over the place." She said with
a laugh. "Anyway, I had that whole Phoenix character plotted out in my head when I came in to do this third movie. Brett let
me do it that way, and I have no regrets."
If there's one major weakness inherent in the sequel, however, it's
the movie's attempted scope: There are enough disparate themes and characters to pad out three X-Men sequels, instead of the
single 104-minute effort cobbled together here.
It's a similar fate that befell another Marvel title, The Avengers,
in its comic book form from the late '70s.
It, too, pursued a policy of superhero overpopulation, at one point
boasting 18 different members of the team, along with their respective subplots, spouses and nemeses - not one of whom you
cared a single iota about, because the individual protagonists had been so watered down.
The Avengers worked best in the '60s, with its originator
(and the creator of X-Men) Stan Lee, then later Roy Thomas, scribing the yarns.
Back then, when the group was composed of a quartet of highly emotional
characters, time was given to develop their baser emotions like jealously, envy and rivalry, alongside their obvious strengths,
developing loyalty, and an inclination to do the right thing.
The first two X-Men movies focused in such a manner on the core foursome
of Jean Grey, Wolverine, Rogue and Scott Summers, supported by an ensemble cast of personalities like Magneto, Prof. Xavier,
Mystique, Nightcrawler, Storm, Pyro and Iceman.
This third film rams together all of them - sans Nightcrawler - and
a helluva lot of other people besides: two-dimensional walk-ons just begging for further development.
"It's tricky when you have that many characters," Janssen agreed.
"At one point I think there were 12 or 15 main ones, and to even think about giving every single character a storyline with
a beginning, middle and end is almost unheard of. There were a lot of actors to please, and a lot of characters to somehow
make interesting. At times you might find that there are a lot of bold brushstrokes instead of intricate development, but
in some way - across the three movies - they managed to give each of the central figures a solid character."
And then there are the capes.
We all thought Pixar had finally put paid to superheroes' attachment
to their capes, when The Incredibles referenced the demise of several whose deaths were directly attributable to
their voluminous fashion accoutrement.
Marvel comics themselves have also previously poked fun at capes,
which dominated the superhero costumes of their chief rival, D.C.
Way back in 1974 when Captain America adopted a cape to go with his
new alias as the Nomad, he tripped on it in pursuit of evil fiends - then promptly tore it off and tossed it.
Yet, incredibly, the X-Men have paid little heed.
Here you'll find that Storm (Halle Berry) and Magneto (Ian McKellen,
who should know better) revel in their swirling, camp attire.
"Clearly they haven't seen it," Janssen quipped, with a wry smile.
"But I guess a lot of superheroes wear capes. I only remember because I have a dog, and one Halloween I gave him a little
Superman costume, and it had a cape."
As the interview wound up, Janssen adopted a comically rueful tone.
"But poor Jean Grey - and Phoenix - never had a cape."
(Sep. 2, 2006)